Free Games Forum
Free Games Games Forums Music Forums TV Forums

  Free Games Forum Home FORUM
HOME
Search Posts SEARCH
POSTS
Who's Online WHO'S
ONLINE
Log in LOG
IN
Rules & FAQ RULES / FAQ
REPORT SPAM

Free Games Forum: Game Forums: Runescape Forum:
Update

 

 


Nish
Member

Dec 18, 2007, 2:45 AM

Post #1 of 18 (343 views)
Shortcut
Update Can't Post


Quote
As promised in last week's newspost, here are some of the initial ideas we have to further improve the player interaction in the game.
1. Expect the first new single-way player-vs-player combat area to hit the game in the first half of next year, along with a number of other PvP updates in the future.
2. As many people have suggested, we're planning to raise the 3,000gp staking/trading limit for certain players. This will be proportional to the number of Quest Points you have, with the top-end being ten-times what it is now! This should still offer protection from cheats, while also giving you more flexibility in your staking and trading activities.
3. We're looking at a way of giving LootSharers the ability to receive their drops as coins straight away, so that large items can be split between the party immediately. To avoid unbalancing the economy, we’re investigating ways that this could be tied in with the Grand Exchange (i.e, with the item in question being sold on the Exchange and the resulting proceeds being split between the team).
4. We are planning on adding an 'item lending' feature to the game. To prevent indefinite loans, you will be able to lend an item for the duration of your session (once either the lender or receiver logs out, the item will go back again). Obviously, we need to design this VERY carefully to cover all eventualities, but we reckon we can work something out.
These are just a taster of the many ideas we have gathered from you or from our developers. They should really improve your enjoyment of RuneScape, without opening the door for real-world traders. This doesn’t even mention the Grand Exchange, which we can go into more detail about…
The Grand Exchange
We have to hold our hands up and admit that a handful of starting prices were a little off. It was a huge task to get 15,000+ items valued correctly and some slipped through the net. We’re on the case, though, as we have already formed a team to manage the Grand Exchange!
As well as getting the starting price right, this team will regularly check prices on an ongoing basis, making sure that they naturally and accurately represent the current state of the player economy. Of course, they won’t be alone, as YOU will be there to help them! A new Forum, centred on the Grand Exchange, will be available to highlight any concerns you have about prices and marketplace matters, while a new web page is already in the works which will allow you to track item prices over a long period of time.
Some smaller changes to the Grand Exchange:
  • Purchased items of a large quantity will be automatically noted
  • There will be less unnecessary clicks when buying or selling items
  • A ‘1,000’ quantity button will be introduced
  • Access to single-click increases to your item quantity




lo1
Senior Member


Dec 18, 2007, 5:30 AM

Post #2 of 18 (332 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Nish] Update [In reply to] Can't Post

Maybe a point or something.


"Poo-tee-weet?"


chunk sketch
Enthusiast


Dec 18, 2007, 9:32 AM

Post #3 of 18 (322 views)
Shortcut
Re: [lo1] Update [In reply to] Can't Post

this is a good plan. they really need to raise the staking limit to atleast 100k and bring back atleast a couple worlds with normal pking for the pkers and stakers. other than that i think this is great


(16:06:39) <+coolgreencat> You can't stick bacon in a vagina, chunk.
(16:06:43) <+coolgreencat> Not in america anyway.


lo1
Senior Member


Dec 18, 2007, 10:27 AM

Post #4 of 18 (315 views)
Shortcut
Re: [chunk sketch] Update [In reply to] Can't Post


Quote
bring back atleast a couple worlds with normal pking for the pkers and stakers.


That'd be stupid of them, since rwtraders could meet up there for a cup of tea.


"Poo-tee-weet?"


Jindrak
Veteran / Moderator


Dec 18, 2007, 1:14 PM

Post #5 of 18 (303 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Nish] Update [In reply to] Can't Post

2. As many people have suggested, we're planning to raise the 3,000gp staking/trading limit for certain players. This will be proportional to the number of Quest Points you have, with the top-end being ten-times what it is now! This should still offer protection from cheats, while also giving you more flexibility in your staking and trading activities.

JESUS CHRIST YOU CAN STAKE 30K IF YOU COMPLETED ALL THE QUESTS HOLY SHT@@@@@@

Wait, nevermind.


AHUAISNUIOOAMDIOQNDIOQWNDIOQNDIONASOINASDOIADOIJADOIJQWDOIJQ


Iluvata
Enthusiast


Dec 18, 2007, 1:35 PM

Post #6 of 18 (298 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Jindrak] Update [In reply to] Can't Post

Omfg, lets tell the popo. Jesus [Expletive Deleted]ing christ.




(20:20:29) <+Varenagan> I love farting with an itchy anus. It helps.


knight of dight
Enthusiast


Dec 19, 2007, 12:38 AM

Post #7 of 18 (279 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Iluvata] Update [In reply to] Can't Post

30k is just as meaningless as 3k. It needs to be at least 100k. No geepee farmer will bother to complete all quests just to RWT 100k -.-


lo1
Senior Member


Dec 19, 2007, 3:19 AM

Post #8 of 18 (274 views)
Shortcut
Re: [knight of dight] Update [In reply to] Can't Post

It should be 1 mil for ALL QUESTS completed. Not many people enjoy completing all the [Expletive Deleted]ing quests if you guys don't know.


"Poo-tee-weet?"


knight of dight
Enthusiast


Dec 19, 2007, 9:20 AM

Post #9 of 18 (263 views)
Shortcut
Re: [lo1] Update [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
It should be 1 mil for ALL QUESTS completed. Not many people enjoy completing all the [Expletive Deleted]ing quests if you guys don't know.


I agree... It should be at least 100k, but 1m would be the best. I can just picture those Chinese bastards struggling to complete the quests because of their limited knowledge of English. That image makes me smile inside.


lo1
Senior Member


Dec 19, 2007, 10:16 AM

Post #10 of 18 (258 views)
Shortcut
Re: [knight of dight] Update [In reply to] Can't Post

You know I wish the chinese government would sue jagex's ass for saying that those are chinese companies from the chinese mafia from the chinese world. There are chinese companies, as well as american companies, as well as english companies... chinese people are not the only one making money with runescape for [Expletive Deleted]'s sake.


"Poo-tee-weet?"


knight of dight
Enthusiast


Dec 19, 2007, 10:28 AM

Post #11 of 18 (257 views)
Shortcut
Re: [lo1] Update [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
You know I wish the chinese government would sue jagex's ass for saying that those are chinese companies from the chinese mafia from the chinese world. There are chinese companies, as well as american companies, as well as english companies... chinese people are not the only one making money with runescape for [Expletive Deleted]'s sake.


Is that why most of the gold farmers/bots I have seen had Chinese names like luizong24 and xiaoming44?


lo1
Senior Member


Dec 19, 2007, 10:36 AM

Post #12 of 18 (255 views)
Shortcut
Re: [knight of dight] Update [In reply to] Can't Post


Quote
Is that why most of the gold farmers/bots I have seen had Chinese names like luizong24 and xiaoming44?


Do you have any knowledge at all of the chinese language? Good.

And I've seen names such as feetmang. Feetmang is definately chinese.


"Poo-tee-weet?"


-Pwnt-
Veteran / Moderator

Dec 19, 2007, 10:42 AM

Post #13 of 18 (254 views)
Shortcut
Re: [lo1] Update [In reply to] Can't Post

Just because a person has an Asian name doesn't mean they are fluent of the Chinese origin. Stop being so naive.


lo1
Senior Member


Dec 19, 2007, 11:20 AM

Post #14 of 18 (249 views)
Shortcut
Re: [-Pwnt-] Update [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
Just because a person has an Asian name doesn't mean they are fluent of the Chinese origin. Stop being so naive.


That is to knight, right?


"Poo-tee-weet?"


-Pwnt-
Veteran / Moderator

Dec 19, 2007, 12:24 PM

Post #15 of 18 (244 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Muchuchu] Update [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
I would assume so Dork



lo1
Senior Member


Dec 19, 2007, 12:41 PM

Post #16 of 18 (241 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Muchuchu] Update [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
I would assume so Dork


Quote
Re: [lo1] Update


gf much


"Poo-tee-weet?"


Shooo
Newbie


Dec 19, 2007, 1:06 PM

Post #17 of 18 (239 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Nish] Update [In reply to] Can't Post

Downdate


Nish
Member

Nov 29, 2008, 10:25 PM

Post #18 of 18 (114 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Shooo] Update [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
Downdate


touché, sir

 
 
 


Search for (options) Web Design by Web Ideas - Page loaded in: 0.47 s on (CGI/1.1)