Free Games Forum
Free Games Games Forums Music Forums TV Forums

  Free Games Forum Home FORUM
HOME 		Search Posts SEARCH
POSTS 		Who's Online WHO'S
ONLINE 		Log in LOG
IN 		Rules & FAQ RULES / FAQ
REPORT SPAM

Free Games Forum: General: Debating Forum:
Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility?

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 Next page Last page  View All


Invidious
Senior Member


Jul 1, 2007, 6:15 PM

Post #51 of 97 (522 views)
Shortcut
Re: [CROMEDOME] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
In Reply To
In Reply To
In Reply To
I once pondered: Why has God yet to curse us for making such terrible things, such terrible devices, as nuclear weapons. I then found my answer: They are, in themselves, the curse.
Actually I think that nukes and other WoMDs are a gift as well, a double edged sword.

They insure that countries don't go to war on a massive scale due to fear of Total Annhilation.

Nukes are an insurance, as long as religious fanatics and zealots don't get hold of them there's nothing to fear. And even if WWIII comes into reality it'll be fought with only conventional weapons. There's the possibility of it ending with Total Annhilation though...
Insure? When you are fighting against people who think if they die killing jews they will go to heaven and constantly state they have no care for this life what would stop them from killing themselves and everyone else?

You didn't read the second part.

Taz says:
... I want tits.
Taz says:
SEND TIT TO TAZG
Taz says:
IT'S BECAUSE I'M STOOPID
Taz says:
BECAUSE I ASSED A CURTAIN


CROMEDOME
Enthusiast


Jul 1, 2007, 6:17 PM

Post #52 of 97 (521 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Invidious] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
Ugh, the second part gets me every time


Invidious
Senior Member


Jul 1, 2007, 6:20 PM

Post #53 of 97 (519 views)
Shortcut
Re: [CROMEDOME] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
But seriously, think about it.

If it weren't for Nukes how do you think the second World War would've ended? Think of the casualties from Operation Downfall. Then think about the aftermath. Look at all the wars-by-proxy during the Cold War. Those happened WITH the threat Total Annihilation. Imagine the scale of war that would've happened without the threat. There would've been a third World War already replacing the Cold War.

Nukes are a paradox.

Taz says:
... I want tits.
Taz says:
SEND TIT TO TAZG
Taz says:
IT'S BECAUSE I'M STOOPID
Taz says:
BECAUSE I ASSED A CURTAIN


CROMEDOME
Enthusiast


Jul 1, 2007, 6:25 PM

Post #54 of 97 (518 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Invidious] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
I see your point I might edit this later I am too tired to discuss anything with insight or intelligence


(This post was edited by CROMEDOME on Jul 1, 2007, 6:25 PM)


MM Mercer
Senior Member


Jul 1, 2007, 8:19 PM

Post #55 of 97 (509 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Lynch] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
In Reply To
In Reply To
In Reply To
Basically, based on what I believe I know, USA being involved with Iraq and other small countries has drawn attention from other countries who in turn have dipped their noses into our and Iraq's business. Thus, Iraq gets some sort of reinforcement from undisclosed countries. So now, we have all these different countries bombing each other and gaining allies to fight the rest of the world.
1. you had no buisness in iraq other then you wanted cheapier oil
^^^
Most of America agrees you moron. Do your research please. You should also know thats not what he was posting about, so don't change the topic to the lack of American military restraint.
I have bolded what i was replying too. he was saying that people should stay out of iraqa and USA + friends war but really there shouldn't be a war and we shouldn't be there.

Ofcourse you are now reading my sig


Invidious
Senior Member


Jul 1, 2007, 8:37 PM

Post #56 of 97 (508 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Lynch] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
In Reply To
In Reply To
In Reply To
Basically, based on what I believe I know, USA being involved with Iraq and other small countries has drawn attention from other countries who in turn have dipped their noses into our and Iraq's business. Thus, Iraq gets some sort of reinforcement from undisclosed countries. So now, we have all these different countries bombing each other and gaining allies to fight the rest of the world.
1. you had no buisness in iraq other then you wanted cheapier oil
^^^
Most of America agrees you moron. Do your research please. You should also know thats not what he was posting about, so don't change the topic to the lack of American military restraint.



http://my.break.com/media/view.aspx?ContentID=233233

Taz says:
... I want tits.
Taz says:
SEND TIT TO TAZG
Taz says:
IT'S BECAUSE I'M STOOPID
Taz says:
BECAUSE I ASSED A CURTAIN


Blackworm25
Senior Member


Jul 2, 2007, 2:16 AM

Post #57 of 97 (501 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Invidious] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
In Reply To
broken images make invidibutt angry.

MadMadMadMadMadMadMadMadMad
It was a nuke going off.

<===(------------------------
"LOOKS LIKE A HUGE PENIS."
-Ninjaboy421

"Lee split his army and attacked Hooker from both sides at Chancellorsville..."


Lynch
Enthusiast


Jul 2, 2007, 5:29 AM

Post #58 of 97 (496 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Invidious] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
In Reply To
In Reply To
In Reply To
In Reply To
Basically, based on what I believe I know, USA being involved with Iraq and other small countries has drawn attention from other countries who in turn have dipped their noses into our and Iraq's business. Thus, Iraq gets some sort of reinforcement from undisclosed countries. So now, we have all these different countries bombing each other and gaining allies to fight the rest of the world.
1. you had no buisness in iraq other then you wanted cheapier oil
^^^
Most of America agrees you moron. Do your research please. You should also know thats not what he was posting about, so don't change the topic to the lack of American military restraint.



http://my.break.com/...spx?ContentID=233233
You know how that works right? They walk around all day, and put the answers that wrong. Why? It sells.

The world may not consist of one person, but to one person you may be the world.


Invidious
Senior Member


Jul 2, 2007, 8:58 AM

Post #59 of 97 (490 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Lynch] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
Dude, look at the picture.

I'm joking idiot.

Taz says:
... I want tits.
Taz says:
SEND TIT TO TAZG
Taz says:
IT'S BECAUSE I'M STOOPID
Taz says:
BECAUSE I ASSED A CURTAIN


-Pwnt-
Veteran


Jul 8, 2007, 1:19 PM

Post #60 of 97 (474 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Invidious] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
Quote
Nukes are a paradox.
In that do you mean by causing destruction it contradicts itself?


“Begin doing what you want to do now. We are not living in eternity. We have only this moment, sparkling like a star in our hand - and melting like a snowflake…”


Invidious
Senior Member


Jul 8, 2007, 1:57 PM

Post #61 of 97 (474 views)
Shortcut
Re: [-Pwnt-] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
Read mah posts pl0x.

I find the fact that nukes have such destructive potential yet save lives everyday to be paradoxical.

Taz says:
... I want tits.
Taz says:
SEND TIT TO TAZG
Taz says:
IT'S BECAUSE I'M STOOPID
Taz says:
BECAUSE I ASSED A CURTAIN


Lynch
Enthusiast


Jul 8, 2007, 4:35 PM

Post #62 of 97 (466 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Invidious] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
In Reply To
Read mah posts pl0x.

I find the fact that nukes have such destructive potential yet save lives everyday to be paradoxical.
I find it humorous.

The world may not consist of one person, but to one person you may be the world.


neocloud101
Veteran


Jul 8, 2007, 4:44 PM

Post #63 of 97 (465 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Lynch] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
lol. What else is funny is that the U.S. has enough nuclear weaponry to blow the entire world 11.5 times over.

SIYA:NKGOIRS


Invidious
Senior Member


Jul 8, 2007, 4:54 PM

Post #64 of 97 (460 views)
Shortcut
Re: [neocloud101] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post


Taz says:
... I want tits.
Taz says:
SEND TIT TO TAZG
Taz says:
IT'S BECAUSE I'M STOOPID
Taz says:
BECAUSE I ASSED A CURTAIN


M3rc3nary
Newbie

Nov 8, 2007, 2:49 PM

Post #65 of 97 (363 views)
Shortcut
Re: [-Pwnt-] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
Yeah I think it's possible.

It may either branch off the war in Iraq, and happen after several years of peace later on.

http://www.pwnem.com


gamesearcher
Newbie


Nov 10, 2007, 10:34 PM

Post #66 of 97 (354 views)
Shortcut
Re: [-Pwnt-] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
In Reply To
TOPIC:
Is World War III a likely possibility?

Supreme Destiny


lo1
Senior Member


Nov 11, 2007, 7:13 AM

Post #67 of 97 (353 views)
Shortcut
Re: [gamesearcher] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
I don't think so. A world war now could cause MASS life destruction. Eisten said something like this "I don't know how the third world war will be like, but I know how the fourth will be, it'll be with stones and bones" (poor translation from the portuguese version I heard). The governants of big powerful countries know that the weaponry available could kill the entire human race, so they'll avoid it as long as possible.

"Poo-tee-weet?"

(This post was edited by lo1 on Nov 11, 2007, 7:15 AM)


killerducky
Senior Member

Dec 29, 2007, 11:11 PM

Post #68 of 97 (311 views)
Shortcut
Re: [-Pwnt-] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
Probably not. The UN would have a [Expletive Deleted] fit.



Yes, but as for suckage I was referring to the gumdrops, not your wrinkly-ass cooked rhubarb jewelsack.

-Athlon XP


kizmmit
Enthusiast


Dec 30, 2007, 8:54 PM

Post #69 of 97 (301 views)
Shortcut
Re: [lo1] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
Remember what the question is "World War III a Likely Possibility?" It isn't "World War III, WILL IT HAPPEN" the answer is yes it is a likely possibility, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's going to happen.

I am but 1 person. What can 1 person achieve? I am going to find out.


solidlion
Newbie


Feb 7, 2008, 12:49 PM

Post #70 of 97 (268 views)
Shortcut
Re: [kizmmit] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
World War III is very likely to happen. It can happen anytime . The question should be, " Are you prepared for World War III?" The world is in chaos, whether we like it or not. Every second , new weapons are discovered, implemented...hidden. You might not agree with me but someone out there is making a huge ROBOT that is made especially for World war III armed with massive nuclear bombs and all those stuff you can think of. Yes, World War III is going to happen and time can only tell when those guys will push the button to arm the bombs to protect their country and people. Wink


"You can do it..if you put your mind to it..."
Level 11 - Warrior - Challenge me to a PVP!
Imagiclife.com - I love this game!


System:
P4 2.5ghz
WinXP
256 Agp Card
SoundCard


.Nova
Member


Feb 7, 2008, 4:16 PM

Post #71 of 97 (266 views)
Shortcut
Re: [solidlion] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
World war 3 is NOT a likely possibility, the political leaders would not get involved with a war of such scale, world war 1 and 2 weren't fought with nuclear weapons.
So its different.
World war 3 would blow up like 7 countries worth of land if it happened.


lo1
Senior Member


Feb 7, 2008, 11:06 PM

Post #72 of 97 (264 views)
Shortcut
Re: [.Nova] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
You are right, except for

Quote
World war 3 would blow up like 7 countries worth of land if it happened.
It would be enough to kill every single human being on earth, but not enough to blow the planet. I read about this 2 years ago. If I remember well, it'd take uh... I think 10 thousand or million atomic bombs to destroy 4 inches of the planet's surface.

"Poo-tee-weet?"


gamesearcher
Newbie


Feb 8, 2008, 3:53 PM

Post #73 of 97 (260 views)
Shortcut
Re: [-Pwnt-] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
lolz... its not impossible but i think it will come soon.. ^_^ which side are you going to be.. lol

Supreme Destiny


Dr. Nug
Enthusiast


Feb 9, 2008, 2:51 PM

Post #74 of 97 (255 views)
Shortcut
Re: [gamesearcher] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
World War... Not Civil War.


ridin spinnaz ridin spinnaz


Shinysheep
Senior Member


Mar 2, 2008, 11:46 PM

Post #75 of 97 (235 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Shinysheep] Debate: World War III a Likely Possibility? [In reply to] Can't Post
In Reply To
lol.

Jesus: I have return-what the [Expletive Deleted] is that? *points into sky*

Nuclear missile: HAHAHAHAHHAAHAHA NOOB!

*kaboom*

Satan: You idiots. You just let me-OH [Expletive Deleted]!

Nuclear missile #2: HAHAHA SATAN YOU GONNA GET RAPED!

*kaboom #2*















Vageta: It's OVER NINE THOUSAND!
OH god.

Was I really like that?

Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis ad capul tuum saxum immane mittam.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 Next page Last page  View All
 
 


Search for (options) Web Design by Web Ideas - Page loaded in: 0.28 s on (CGI/1.1)