
Shinysheep
Senior Member

Mar 22, 2007, 1:26 PM
Post #20 of 20
(223 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Re: [jamman] Did King Arthur exist?
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Ther si some evidenc that there was an arthur... but he wasnt a 'knight in shining armour, more likely he was a British warlord who held off the invadin saxons aroung the tyurn of the 6th century. At kingship ceromonies in england during the 6th century BC, they would place the kings sword on a stone, which is where the 'sword in the ston' may of originated. "...around the middle of the 6th century, surviving records show a large, atypical number of men named 'arthur', which suggests a sudden fashion for sons to be named after a famous and powerful man... The first recorded mention of Arthur occurs aronud 300 years after he would have lived, the last years of the 8th century AD, in Nennius's histories of England, where he does make much of this 'Arthur'. However, he never refers to him as a kingbut rather 'Dux Bellorum' the leader of battles, or warlord... " Bernard Cromwell,The Winter king Penguin books, New York, 1996 p. 491-492
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis ad capul tuum saxum immane mittam.
(This post was edited by Shinysheep on Mar 22, 2007, 1:28 PM)
|