In Reply To

Because I have never heard of a religion, thank thinks god caused the Big Bang to make earth.

Ive seen my share of fossil evidence and the earths layers tell us that it's at least 2 billion years old, ( its 4 billion years old{according to most})

Scientist and my school teachers.

Scientist and my school teachers.

In Reply To

*bursts out laughing*

You would do VERY well to just shut your mouth right now. Seriously.

Scientists have been proven wrong MANY times in history.
Dont even get me started on schoolteachers.

So can you explain in your own words why you believe these things, or have you just heard it so many times that you think it's true?

Where did god come from? ;_;

In Reply To

He didn't.

Ive seen my share of ... schoolteachers

In Reply To

Thank you for proving my point.

Who says that layers of earth didnt form faster back in the day?

6,000, son.

Quote

In Reply To

I'm sorry, but if the earth were 4,000 years old, then all the generations of fossils they have found would have to squeeze in, in that time period.

In Reply To

Who said you need a billion years to fit them? Who said they even represent generations at all?

Oh yeah, schoolteachers.

See what I mean?

You've not seen evidence yourself. YOU have not researched and discovered reasonable explanations. You can't explain it in your own words. You just assumed it to be correct.

"For example Australopithecus. There's a whole bunch of those listed in that list of "notable" fossils, which is pretty sad since they were proven years ago to be just regular apes existing today. And Nutcracker man is also an australopithecus. It's funny how many of the most complete fossils tend to be the ones that are disproven. Have you considered that perhaps the others are too incomplete to prove anything either way? As for the skulls closer to modern humans, the fact that they are different than regular humans doesn't prove that they were half-ape at all. Look at a baby skull. Look at a 5-year-olds skull. Look at a teenager's skull. Look at a 30-year-olds skull. Look at a 100-year-olds skull. They're all different. If humans' lifespans were 5 or 10 times longer in the past, those features would keep growing. A human skull with vague ape-ish features could simply be a human that died around the age of 500 or 800. Recently it has been discovered that "homo habilis" and "erectus" lived at the same time (but in different places) and "neanderthal" was discovered in the same place as modern human bones. These fossils are no proof at all. They're mostly just apes from fairly recent times." --TazG

There is no way to determine how old things are based on where they are found. It's based on an imaginary assumption, and these facts and more show how that assumption holds no validity at all.

Also, They could have live with some dinosaurs, but not T rex'es or any larger than that.

It seems impractical that 4,000 years fossils would be here.

In Reply To

Impractical based on the assumption that it takes longer than that for things to fossilize. But There is no way to determine how old things are based on where they are found. So how exactly do you conlude that it's impractical?